requestId:684c3e31691d88.95209979.
The Doctrine of the Mean and Dong Zhongshu’s Thoughts
——The Characteristics of the Doctrine of the Mean and the Age of Books
Author: Jin Chunfeng
Source: “Dong Zi and Confucianism Research” WeChat Public Number
Time: Confucius was in the 2570th year of the Gengzi July 21st Jiayin
src=”https://static.rujiazg.com/storage/article/640-41.jpg!article_800_auto”>
Dong Zhongshu thought that although the master tried his best to study and made great progress, he was still far away. It can be said that it still does not exist and is in the context of our academic circle. Like Xi’an, it should also be the site where protecting website vigorously promotes and discusses research, but it is basically not the position of Dong Zi (Teacher Lin Lechang attaches great importance to discussing Dong Zi, which is a personal matter). The whole country can’t talk about it.
Dong Zi still has many bad reputations, such as the principle of thinking, the principle of monarchy, the three-way killings, the movement of creating gods, etc. The Chinese Philosophy and Historical Scholars also hold negative views. The textbook “Fifteen Lectures on Chinese Philosophy” published earlier by the Beida Department of Philosophy simply removed Dong Zhongshu and Han Dynasty. But I don’t know how could Wei Han understand? In the Song Dynasty, like Zhou Dunza’s “Taiju Diagram” and Zhu Xi’s annotations, they had to keep their ears silent. Without the origin and foundation of the view of the way of heaven, and without mentioning Zhu Xi’s enlightenment of nature, Zhu Xi became the Placard of ancient Greeks. The “Four Books Collection” became the annotation of Placard’s thoughts, and the name of Chinese philosophy has been destroyed.
After studying Dong Zhongshu and Han Dynasty’s thinking, we can understand the position of Han Dynasty in the Chinese thinking civilization. This is a New Year. Don’t understand it thoroughly, traverse it, and solve it. Talk about Chinese civilization thinking and philosophy can only be a conversation outside the door.
“Han Book·Five Elements Records” says: “Dong Zhongshu began to promote Yinyang, and was a Confucian scholar.” But Zhuangzi had already pointed out that “it is easy to use Tao Yang to do Yinyang”, so why should Dong Zi start to recommend it? The “Yin Yin” mentioned by the clanzi is a simple term for the unity, and Yin Yang represents all opposite sides in the unity. The yin Yang that Dong Zi “firstly recommends” is the overview of “the atmosphere of six combinations, combined into one, divided into yin Yang, judged as four times, and listed as the five elements”, which refers to the movement pattern of the way of heaven. This study combines the focus of Dong Zhongshu’s thoughts. The one who has a clear science is “The Inner of Emperor Huang”; the one who has clear theology is a disaster; the one who has clear philosophy is “The Book of Changes”, which is “The Law of Heaven and the Law of Heaven”. As Sima said, “The Yi is written on the four times and five elements of Liuheyang, and therefore it grows from change.” The originality and first driving force of the diagramIt’s “Too Extreme”. Dong Zhongshu explained it with the philosophical goal of “the heart of Liuhe Biology” and “everything is to be regarded as a way to serve people.” If it is interpreted as the innate theory of the universe or the intrinsic theory, it becomes ordinary Eastern philosophy.
Why does “Han Yi” in Meng Xijingfang’s “Yi Xue” take Dong’s following words as the basis. I made a discussion in the meeting and related articles of “Zhou Yi Research”. Interested readers can visit it. What we want to talk about tomorrow is the relationship between “Doing the Mean” and Dong Zhongshu’s “starting” thinking. This first look will cause surprise. Are these two related? After analyzing and proofing, you will see that only by having a clear and accurate answer to this can the Doctrine of the Mean show its original face, rather than the Doctrine of the Mean that is mainly interpreted.
A little thing. ”, the text of “Doing the Mean” was compiled by the Han people
“Historical Records: Confucius Family” says: “Zi Si wrote “Doing the Mean”. Later generations believe that the current “Doing the Mean” was written by Zi Si. But this is a theory that the text has not been reflected and analyzed, which is not suitable for the academic request of “supporting it is reasonable and the words are reasonable”. Among the “Four Books”, there is no question of whether the text can be reliable and trustworthy in “The Four Books”, “Theory” and “Mencius” have different differences, and scholars began to doubt it in the Song Dynasty. In fact, this book cannot be written by Zisi, nor can it be written by Zisi and his later studies. On the contrary, it is a collection of comments compiled by Hanren.
Wang Bai, a native of the Song Dynasty, said in “The Ancient Doctrine of the Mean: Postscript”: “The thoughts of foolishness often continuity, and the words are always interacting. He thinks but dares not speak, and he doubts but dares not ask. One day, he met Xihan’s “The Art of the Mean” saying: “Two chapters of “The Doctrine of the Mean”.’ href=”https://twlovecandy520.org/”>Baobao price pttAncient notes say: ‘There is a chapter of “The Doctrine of the Mean”. ‘But he did not say that his demise was. He was alert and then he knew that Ban Gu’s fashion saw that his first two things were. If it was combined and uneven, was it from the hands of Xiao Dai?” The teacher of Rongyou Ran quoted Wang’s words and said: “The first paragraph is from the ‘the destiny of heaven’ to the ‘the position of Liuhe’, and all things are cultivated’, and the last paragraph is from ‘I am not the upper position of the person’ to ‘no sound and no smell’, and many words are spoken about the relationship between people and the universe, which is like the direction of the secret theory in Mencius’ philosophy. It is also a matter of pursuing. The text of the text is also a matter of pursuing. The middle section, from “Zhongni said that the doctrine of the mean of the people” to “the pre-Tao Dao is not pursuing”, talks a lot about human affairs, which is like pursuing it according to Confucius’s teachings. The text of the text is also a matter of pursuing the pursuing. From this point of view, the middle section is like the “Doctrine of the Mean” originally written by Zisi, namely “Han Book·Zhu” Wenzhi” The 23 chapters of “Zi Si” in Confucianism. The first and last two paragraphs were added by later Confucian scholars, namely the two chapters of “The Doctrine of the Mean” in “Han Shu·The Legend of the World” in “The Thirteen Schools of All Gifts”. The words “The Legend of the World of the World” are all in the latter paragraphs, which is even more visible.” Teacher Rong, the teacher, thought in his late years: “The Doctrine of the Mean”The social situation that reacts is clearly the atmosphere after the Qin Dynasty. The destiny, nature, sincerity and clarity discussed in the Doctrine of the Mean are also more detailed than what Meng Hu said, and it seems to be the discovery of Meng Hu Hu’s thoughts. “Han Shu·Archive” is written in “The Confucian Confucianism” and “Zi Si”; “The Legend of the Mean” is written in “The Book of Six Arts” and “The Book of the Mean” is written in “The Book of the Six Arts”. There is one article in “Zi Si”, but the “Doctor of the Mean” in “Treasures” is obviously the “Doctor of the Mean” of “Treasures”. “Guo Yi had a detailed discussion on the situation of the book “Doing the Mean” and accepted the statement of the teacher Narong; but he believed that “the discussion department was obviously written by one person and was a private work.” “Na Zisi wrote, before “Mencius”. However, the evidence provided by Guo Yi, such as the application of the word “and”, just like the application of the word “典”, is just as common as the application of the word “典”, such as “典”, “典”, “典”. This article believes that the relationship between the current “典” and the analysis department of Dong Zhongshu is particularly close. Only through Only when Dong Zi thought of this key was this way to make this door clear.
The Doctrine of the Mean clearly reflects the chapters of Qin and Han’s thoughts. Later generations have pointed out that there is:
Chapter 28: “The Master said: ‘I am stupid and like to use my own use, and I am willing to be self-professional. Born in this world, it is contrar
發佈留言